Who are the 7 House members who broke with their party by voting to ban assault weapons?

WASHINGTON — The Home on Friday handed a invoice that may ban assault weapons after a summer time of lethal mass shootings that reignited requires extra gun management.

Though the measure principally toed occasion traces, two Republicans and 5 Democrats cut up from their events within the vote, in line with the official tally.

Assault weapons have been utilized in quite a few mass shootings, together with murders this 12 months in Uvalde, Texas, and Buffalo; Parkland, Florida in 2018; Las Vegas in 2017; and Newtown, Connecticut in 2012.

There isn’t a vote scheduled within the Senate but on banning assault weapons, though the measure just isn’t anticipated to cross the chamber. At the very least 10 Republican senators must be part of the 50 Democrats to beat a filibuster.

This is what we find out about why all seven Home members broke ranks within the vote.

Prohibition of assault weapons: ‘People need to be secure’: Home passes assault weapons ban that has little likelihood within the Senate

Republicans vote in favor of the invoice

Republican Representatives Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Chris Jacobs of New York voted in favor of the ban alongside 215 of their fellow Democrats.

Jacobs, whose Western New York district consists of suburban Buffalo, introduced in June that he wouldn’t search re-election as he confronted backlash for his help for gun management measures. .

He mentioned in a ready assertion that whereas he “strongly” helps the Second Modification, he doesn’t help “quick access to high-powered semi-automatic weapons and high-capacity magazines which have time and time once more resulted in mass shootings”. Uvalde’s capturing prompted him to help an assault weapons ban, he mentioned.

“We have now an obligation to maintain all People secure,” Jacobs mentioned. “These weapons don’t belong to our communities. Though this invoice just isn’t excellent, I consider it can save harmless lives.”

USA TODAY has additionally requested remark from Fitzpatrick’s workplace.

Democrats vote towards the invoice

The 5 Democrats to vote “no” on the invoice alongside 208 Republicans had been Representatives Henry Cuellar of Texas, Jared Golden of Maine, Vicente Gonzalez of Texas, Ron Sort of Wisconsin and Kurt Schrader of Oregon.

James Rivera, a spokesman for Gonzalez, instructed USA TODAY that whereas Gonzalez helps different gun management measures, banning assault rifles doesn’t resolve the issue.

“There are tens of tens of millions of assault rifles already in circulation throughout America, a lot of them utilized by accountable gun homeowners for searching in South Texas,” Rivera mentioned. “And banning a few of these designs will do nothing to scale back the general dangers. Our purpose ought to be to maintain weapons out of attain of people that pose a hazard to themselves or others.”

Variety mentioned in a ready assertion that whereas he additionally helps some gun management measures, the invoice was “rushed” by way of the Home, leaving him no alternative to contemplate it or seek the advice of with Wisconsin regulation enforcement teams and its constituents. He additionally expressed concern in regards to the present definition of assault weapons within the laws, fearing that too broad a definition may result in a “crackdown” on different firearms.

USA TODAY has requested remark from the places of work of the opposite three members of Congress.

Contributor: Katherine Swartz, Related Press